Featured

SC Cites ‘Technical Difficulty’ On Hearing ‘Protect Heritage Of Lord Jagannath’ Plea

By
OB Bureau

New Delhi: The Supreme Court had agreed to hear a petition, challenging the Odisha government’s decision to carry out excavation work around Jagannath Temple in Puri. The matter, however, was not listed for Tuesday due to a technical difficulty.

The bench of Justices B R Gavai and Hima Kohli said that they cannot hear it unless the matter is allotted to it by the Chief Justice of India, the LiveLaw reported.

The petitioner has challenged Orissa High Court’s order refusing to restrain the state from carrying out any excavation in and around Lord Jagannath Temple, Puri. The counsels appearing for the petitioner urged the court to take up the matter at 2 pm and submitted that “blatant desecration” of the property is going on. The bench, however, informed that the matter hasn’t been listed due to some technical difficulty, and unless the competent authority allots it to a particular bench, it’s not in the hands of the judges to hear the matter.

Justice Gavai said that judges hearing matters during vacation have no administrative powers of the Chief Justice of India to list and allot cases. “We never faced this difficulty in High Courts. In High Courts, a vacation judge has to be judge for all purposes even for administrative purposes, Here, we are controlled by Registry. If it’s allotted to us, we’re willing to hear it even at 2 pm. Unless it is allotted to us, our hands are tied”, Justice Gavai said while responding to a request for an urgent hearing of the matter.

Justice Gavai further said that it is the prerogative of the Chief Justice of India to allot cases as the Master of the Roster and that the vacation bench cannot assume the administrative powers of the CJI. “We allowed circulation but there’s a technical difficulty, unless Chief allots it to a particular bench, it can’t be,” he added.

The present special leave petition filed through advocate Gautam Das argued that the state agencies have been working in gross violation of Section 20A of The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. The petitioner alleged that the unauthorised construction work is posing a serious threat to the structure of the 12th-century shrine and sought a ban on all construction or excavation work on temple land.

OB Bureau

Recent Posts

IPL Auction: KKR Break Bank For Venkatesh On Lucrative Day For Indian Players; Check Top Buys

Mumbai: The first day of the IPL mega player auction at Jeddah threw up several…

November 24, 2024

Odisha Govt Hands Over Case Of Attack On Dharmasala MLA To Crime Branch

Bhubaneswar: The Odisha government has handed over the investigation into the attack on Dhramasala MLA…

November 24, 2024

Commissionerate Police Issues Traffic Advisory During Winter Session Of Odisha Assembly; Details Here

Bhubaneswar: The Commissionerate of Police on Sunday issued an advisory for movement of vehicular traffic…

November 24, 2024

Elon Musk Proposal: Fire US Federal Employees Who Want To Work From Home

New York: Now that President-elect Donald Trump has tasked Elon Musk with the responsibility of co-heading…

November 24, 2024

Odisha Govt Warns Of Stern Action For Renting Out Its Quarters

Bhubaneswar: The Odisha government has warned its employees of stern action for sub-letting their allotted…

November 24, 2024

AR Rahman Best Man In The World, Certifies Saira Banu; Then Why Their Separation?

Mumbai: There has been a lot of talk over AR Rahman and his wife Saira…

November 24, 2024

Process On To Form NODC In 2-3 Months, Says Odisha CM Mohan Majhi

Sundargarh: The North Odisha Development Council (NODC) would be formed in 2-3 months, said Chief…

November 24, 2024

Odisha DGP Reviews Security Arrangements For President’s Visit To Puri

Puri: Director General of Police (DGP) YB Khurania on Sunday reviewed the security arrangements for…

November 24, 2024