India

Centre Opposes Same-Sex Marriage In SC, Says It Violates Concept Of Indian Family Unit

Bhubaneswar: The Centre stuck to its stand against same-sex marriage in its response to a number of petitions challenging the laws against it in the Supreme Court.

The Centre on Sunday filed an affidavit in the apex court in response to a batch of petitions challenging the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, Foreign Marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act and other marriage laws as unconstitutional on the ground that those deny same sex couples the right to marry.

In its affidavit, the government said the same-sex marriage is not compatible with the concept of an “Indian family unit” which consists of “a husband, a wife, and children which necessarily presuppose a biological man as a ‘husband’, a biological woman as a ‘wife’ and the children born out of the union between the two – who are reared by the biological man as father and the biological woman as mother”.

“It is submitted that despite the decriminalisation of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners cannot claim a fundamental right for same-sex marriage to be recognised under the laws of the country,” it said.

The Centre said living together as partners and having sexual relationship by same sex individuals (which is decriminalised now) is not comparable with the Indian family unit concept, urging the court to reject challenges to the current legal framework lodged by LGBTQ+ couples.

The government also argued that registration of marriage of same-sex persons results in violation of existing personal as well as codified law provisions such as ‘degrees of prohibited relationship’; ‘conditions of marriage’; ‘ceremonial and ritual requirements’ under personal laws governing the individuals.

“The notion of marriage itself necessarily and inevitably presupposes a union between two persons of the opposite sex. This definition is socially, culturally, and legally ingrained into the very idea and concept of marriage and ought not to be disturbed or diluted by judicial interpretation,” NDTV quoted the Centre as stating in the affidavit.

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the matter on Monday.

OB Bureau
Share
Published by
OB Bureau

Recent Posts

Why Union Minister Jual Oram Writes To Odisha Chief Secy For Disciplinary Proceedings Against His PS?

Bhubaneswar: In an unusual move, Union Tribal Affairs Minister Jual Oram has sought disciplinary proceedings… Read More

18 minutes ago

When Varun Dhawan Turned Down Samay Raina’s ‘India’s Got Latent’ Invitation Anticipating ‘Crossfire’ [Watch]

Mumbai: The Samay Raina-hosted ‘India’s Got Latent’ is in the eye of a storm following… Read More

23 minutes ago

Supreme Court On ‘Freebies’ Before Elections: ‘Aren’t We Creating Class Of Parasites’?

New Delhi: Be it Assembly or Lok Sabha polls, all major political parties promise ‘freebies’ in… Read More

33 minutes ago

Shreya Ghoshal: The Queen Of Melody Immortalised At Madame Tussauds

New Delhi: Renowned for her soulful voice and incredible versatility, Shreya Ghoshal has been the… Read More

52 minutes ago

Odisha: SOA Professor’s Automated Oral Biopsy Device Gets US Patent

Bhubaneswar: An automated oral biopsy device developed by a professor of Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (SOA)… Read More

1 hour ago

After Sealing Series In Cuttack, India Post 356 In Final ODI Vs England; Gill (112) & Iyer (78) On Fire Again

Ahmedabad: Shubman Gill tormented England once again to help Team India put up a huge… Read More

1 hour ago