The CBI Has Invited Supreme Court’s Ire: Know Why

The CBI, in a recent application, sought the transfer of over 45 cases outside of West Bengal, alleging that victims displaced by violence were being prevented from returning to their homes by the ruling All India Trinamool Congress (TMC). Additionally, the agency claimed that many witnesses were facing serious intimidation and threats. However, the Supreme Court directed the CBI to amend its petition before it could be heard.

Justice Oka, addressing the CBI’s request, remarked, “If we transfer the matters outside Bengal, we will be certifying that all courts are hostile.” He further noted that the language used in the application could warrant a contempt notice against the officer who filed the affidavit.

ASG SV Raju, representing the CBI, clarified that the agency had no intention of casting aspersions on the judicial system. He explained that the mention of a “hostile environment” referred to threats and intimidation faced by victims and witnesses outside the courtroom, rather than any bias within the judiciary.

Senior advocate Gopal Sankarnarayanan, representing the state of West Bengal, questioned the CBI’s stance, asking, “Why should the agency approach the court in this manner?” In response, the ASG noted that several victims had also filed applications seeking case transfers, citing the intimidation they were facing.

The Supreme Court bench, in its order, stated, “Scandalous accusations have been made against all courts in West Bengal. It is repeatedly averred that a hostile environment prevails in all courts in the state. It is unfortunate that central agencies like the CBI have cast such aspersions on the judiciary in this manner.”

The bench further remarked, “Your officers may not have a favourable view of a particular state, but you cannot cast aspersions on the judiciary.”