Jaipur: In a rare case highlighting the human side of convicts in jail, two murder convicts who developed a romantic relationship while serving their sentences inside a central jail in Rajasthan. The decision was taken after a comprehensive review of their conduct, rehabilitation progress, and legal eligibility, rather than the relationship alone.
The order for a 15-day parole for their marriage was granted by the Rajasthan high court.
The two inmates — Priya Seth alias Neha and Hanuman Prasad — who are imprisoned for separate criminal offences initially met through structured prison programmes such as vocational training sessions, educational classes, and counselling initiatives aimed at reform and social reintegration. Over time, their interaction reportedly grew into an emotional bond, conducted strictly within the framework of prison rules and under supervision.
Jail authorities confirmed that the two maintained exemplary behaviour during their incarceration. They were actively involved in skill-development courses and literacy programmes and
had no record of disciplinary violations. Periodic assessments by prison psychologists and welfare officers noted emotional stability and a positive response to reformative efforts.
Subsequently, their application for parole was examined by the parole board, which took into account the nature of the offences, the period of sentence already undergone, and detailed conduct reports submitted by the jail administration. Following this, the board approved temporary parole, subject to stringent conditions such as mandatory reporting to local police, restrictions on travel, and compliance with all legal directives.
Legal experts say the case reflects a growing recognition of prisoners’ rights within the justice system. “Imprisonment does not extinguish a person’s right to dignity and emotional expression. Reform and rehabilitation remain core objectives of punishment,” said a senior criminal law expert.
The parole order has triggered mixed reactions. Even as human rights activists have welcomed it as a humane and progressive step, critics argue that personal relationships should not influence decisions concerning convicted offenders.
Prison officials, however, maintained that the ruling was grounded in law and reformative principles. The case has renewed discussions on prison reforms, particularly the need for clearer guidelines on interpersonal relationships within correctional facilities and a stronger focus on rehabilitation over retribution.