New Delhi: Strongly defending the use of force during the “Chalo Sansad” march on July 20, the Delhi Police told the Supreme Court that the agitation was hijacked by “anti-social elements” and ‘history-sheeters’, resulting in a breakdown of law and order that left more than 240 police personnel injured.
In an affidavit, filed by Deputy Commissioner of Police Sachin Sharma in response to a batch of petitions alleging excessive use of force against protesters, the Delhi Police said the force was willing to have its actions examined by a court-appointed panel.
“The use of force by police can be gone into by a Committee appointed by this Hon’ble Court and the Delhi Police will fully cooperate with such Committee and provide all details necessary. At the cost of repetition, it is submitted that since a Committee may be appointed by this Hon’ble Court which will examine all the issues related to use of force by the police officials,’ it said.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, had on August 3, while hearing petitions on the issue, clarified that the expression “criminal antecedents” in its order on releasing student protesters referred only to those involved in grave and heinous offences. States could close or withdraw FIRs against the remaining students in accordance with law, it has said.
More than 30,000 people, including alleged miscreants and anti-social elements, had gathered in and around Jantar Mantar on July 20 during the protests, which later turned violent, the affidavit said, as reported by PTI.
The police resorted to force only after repeated warnings and attempts to prevent protesters from advancing towards Parliament were not heeded, it said.
The document also said that 2,873 people who attended the protest had particulars matched existing crime records in official police databases. As many as 92 of the people present at the site were involved in more than 10 criminal cases, of whom 47 were “history-sheeters”, it mentioned.
‘The right to protest peacefully is a fundamental right of every citizen, including young students/young individuals. This right is sacrosanct and must be preserved at any cost. The difficulty arises when an initial peaceful protest turns violent, resulting in bodily harm either to the other citizen as well as the police personnel along with destruction of public property,’ the affidavit said.
‘Anti-social elements merging with the crowd, with criminal background infiltrating such protests either to give bad name to the protestors or to the police, is always a matter of concern and worry, not only in India but everywhere,” it added.
As the violence did not stop and appeared to be spreading rapidly, a graded response was adopted, beginning with minimal use of force, with decisions taken according to the situation on the ground, the affidavit said.
“More than 240 police officers have suffered injuries; the investigation will take into consideration the grievances of the protestors as well as the grievances of those police officers who were deployed on duty and have suffered injuries. Both will have to be and should be investigated impartially. The facts narrated herein are the facts as appear and available as on date which would need an investigation,’ it said.
The permission granted for the protest had lapsed on July 20 itself, but the protesters did not vacate the venue or disperse after holding the dharna, the affidavit claimed.
“The agitation thereafter witnessed the participation of a large number of students, political workers, political leaders, activists and others addressing the gatherings on different dates, thereby repeatedly appealing for continuation and expansion of the agitation, permission of which had already lapsed,” it said.
“It is a matter of fact that during the course of events as they unfolded on July 20, the protest did not remain peaceful and instead pervasive lawlessness had crept in,” it was submitted.
Protestors breached multiple layers of barricades and refused to comply with lawful directions in their bid to reach and gather near Parliament, despite repeated requests and warnings by the police, the document said.
“The protest took an unprecedented turn when a call was given for a march towards Parliament on July 20, the opening day of the Monsoon Session of Parliament. It was this call and at this moment which saw rapidly increasing mobilisation and the crowd strength started increasing thereby necessitating heightened security and measures for maintaining law and order,” it said.
The affidavit justified the action and said the police were duty-bound to maintain law and order, protect life and property from untoward incidents and restrict protesters to the designated protest site.
It was also their duty to prevent the protesters from causing any damage to vital installations, including Parliament, Rashtrapati Bhavan, Seva Teerth, Kartavya Bhavan, other central government offices, and residences of Union ministers, the police said.
“The officers were constrained to use force only and only after the protestors breached the multiple layers of the barricade and started resorting to violence. There is a digital record available that shows disturbing visuals of big groups of protestors targeting lone police officials with stones, sticks, beating them up without any provocation almost in a mob lynching fashion,’ it was submitted.
