New Delhi: The Supreme Court is likely to pass its order on the management of stray dogs across the country on November 7. The chief secretaries of all states and Union Territories were present in court on Monday in answer to summons regarding their responses on how the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules are being implemented.
The Court also took serious note of the violations of its order on feeding of strays by employees of government offices. Indiscriminate feeding and encouraging stray dogs is in clear violation of the Court’s directions on designated feeding spots.
“We will be issuing directions with respect to government institutions and public sector undertakings where employees are feeding the dogs, and supporting and encouraging stray dogs in the area,” the bench of Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice N V Anjaria said.
The Court was hearing a suo motu proceeding based on a news report, raising concerns over public safety following a spate of dog-bite incidents. At the same time, the court wished to balance the statutory mandate of humane treatment under the ABC Rules. These rules require the municipal bodies to sterilise stray dogs and carry out vaccination programme based on the catch-neuter-vaccinate-release model rather than capturing them en masse.
Solicitor general Tushar Mehta informed the court that all states and union territories have filed the responses pursuant to the order passed by the Court on October 27.
“We will try and give directions on the dog-bite incidents that are happening,” the Court said.
On October 27, the Court had observed that despite its directions, the incidents of dog-bites are still happening and this is bringing disrepute to the country in the global platform.
The Court also directed Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) to be made a party and directed senior advocate Gaurav Agarwal, assisting the court as amicus curiae, to compile a checklist of compliances under various heads based on responses of the states and UTs.
Mehta told the Court that even victims of dog bites ought to be heard as private citizens and organisations had prayed for that earlier. the Court had, in the past, allowed organisations and individuals who are dog lovers to participate in the proceedings subject to payment of ₹2 lakh and ₹25,000, respectively, to be used for the welfare of dogs.
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for one of the intervenors pointed out that his clients have prepared a checklist to show how states and UTs have fared on the different aspects contained in the court’s order. The court permitted the same to be shared with the amicus. The bench also permitted the victims of dog-bites to join as parties and waived the condition for them of prior deposit.
Noting that since all states and UTs have submitted responses, the court dispensed with its earlier orders requiring physical presence of chief secretaries. However, the court said, “Their presence will become necessary in case there is any non-compliance of the court’s directions.”
The court had been critical of states for “sleeping over” the order to file status reports and it was their lethargy to file timely reports that drove the court to direct the presence of chief secretaries, which is a rare order for the court to pass.
The suo motu case was initiated on July 28 following reports of rising stray dog attacks and rabies cases, particularly among children in Delhi and other regions.
