New Delhi: It’s not feasible to decide all legal cases in India within a year, the Supreme Court made it clear on Monday.
Hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking that all courts in India resolve cases within a one-year timeframe, the top court dismissed the plea and called it a “publicity interest litigation”.
Hearing the petition filed by Kamlesh Tripathi, a bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, Justices Dipankar Datta and Joymalya Bagchi expressed displeasure over attempts to use the judiciary as a platform for public attention.
Tripathi, who appeared and argued in person, mentioned about “bringing change to the country”, reported PTI.
In response, Chief Justice Kant said a formal petition was not the appropriate vehicle for such aspirations. “You want to change the country, right? You don’t need to file such a petition, you can simply write a letter and send it to me,” the CJI said.
“Do not file petitions just so you can speak in front of the cameras outside,” CJI Kant added.
The bench questioned the practicality of Tripathi’s demand. “You are saying every court should decide within a year? How many such courts do you want?” the CJI-led bench asked.
The Supreme Court noted it was not feasible to issue such a sweeping order, emphasising that systemic judicial reforms should follow proper channels.
“The petitioner, if so advised, may submit a letter on the administrative side to the CJI, with suggestions, if any, for the purpose of judicial reforms. It goes without saying that any such suggestions are always welcome,” the apex court observed.
